The petitioner was liable for his possess predicament. Should the petitioner was dissatisfied Using the judgment in the go well with, he should have used the legal suitable of appeal as opposed to forfeiting that alternative and resorting to a belated software below Section 151, C. Later on, it was https://constitutionlawindhakarac64208.humor-blog.com/31307745/a-secret-weapon-for-corporate-lawyer-in-karachi